Trump Assassination Attempt: A Sniper’s Take on a Chilling Near-Miss
How Trump’s Assassination Attempt at the Golf Course Happened?
Watch New Video Here
Full Video Mathew Murphy on Trump Assassination Attempt
Retd. Green Berets United States Army Special Forces (SF)
Full Video
Shorts
FULL ANIMATION VIDEO
Join the Discussion
Your opinion matters! We invite you to express your views. Join our forum, engage in thoughtful discussions, share information, and submit your content. Let’s delve into diverse perspectives together.
[bbp-single-topic id=6663]
In a chilling revelation, a former US Army sniper, Congressman Cory Mills, dissected the recent assassination attempt on former President Trump during a Fox News interview. His analysis, rooted in military expertise, raises alarming questions about the security failures and potential motives behind this incident. Let’s delve into his insights and the broader implications of this near tragedy.
A Shot That Shouldn’t Have Happened:
Mills minced no words, stating that the shot taken at Trump was “one of the easiest shots.” He emphasized that even a basic training soldier is expected to make this shot consistently. This raises serious concerns about the competence of the security detail and the adequacy of the protective measures in place.
Security Failures and Missed Opportunities:
Mills highlighted a series of security lapses that allowed the would-be assassin to get so close to Trump. He questioned why the rooftop, a clear vantage point, wasn’t secured and why there wasn’t an immediate response from the counter-sniper team after the first shots were fired. He even suggested that a simple deterrent, like a parked police car with its lights on, could have made a difference.
Intentional Negligence or Something More Sinister?
Mills’ tone shifted to speculation as he questioned whether the security failures were merely negligence or if there was something more intentional at play. He pointed out the Biden administration’s emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) hires, implying that this focus might have compromised the quality of the security detail.
Divine Intervention and Political Rhetoric:
The congressman’s analysis took a spiritual turn as he attributed Trump’s survival to “divine intervention.” He also drew parallels between the assassination attempt and the dangerous rhetoric used by President Biden and others against Trump.
Calls for a Thorough Investigation:
Mills concluded by urging a full investigation into the incident, emphasizing that it should be independent and transparent. He stressed the need to uncover the truth behind the security failures and potential motives, drawing comparisons to the January 6th investigation.
Conclusion:
The failed assassination attempt on Trump is a stark reminder of the constant threats faced by public figures. Mills’ expert analysis sheds light on the alarming security lapses and raises questions that demand answers. This incident should serve as a wake-up call for those responsible for protecting our leaders and a stark warning against the dangers of inflammatory political rhetoric. The investigation into this incident is crucial not only for Trump’s safety but for the security of our democracy itself.
Watch the Video Here
Watch: The Incident Explained
[Read More about Politics] [Follow on X]
